HI Jon, I thought I had answered a time or two your question about my view of evidence for God. I mentioned my many posts showing why I believe the physicalist explanation fails, and there are not many alternatives to this view other than transcendence. So while it can be seen as negative, if physicalism is wrong, the evidence for transcendence (some form of spiritual reality) becomes more likely or almost certin. But I recently posted eight reasons why i believe the universe was intended. Please view the video or read that. I've frequently referenced books and articles that I've read that provide powerful evidence, atheist Thomas Nagels Mind and Cosmos is one, but Stephen Meyer Return of the God Hypothesis is very strong.

Finally, I will just offer fine tuning as strong evidence. The only alternative to design is chance, and fine tuning shows that the likelihood of chance is astronomical beyond belief, leading of course the multiverse proposal. Occams Razor, anyone?