I am very honored that a Jungian analyst and co-lecturer with Atmanspacher would read my effort at grasping these things and comment. I would love to hear more about your work with Atmanspacher. As far as I can tell, he is the primary advocate of the dual aspect monism idea which I find som intriguing.

The question of purpose and agency overall is very interesting, especially in relation to biology. I haven't studied Jung enough to know how he accounts for the apparent purpose evident in biology without intelligence and intention (consciousness seems inevitable as well.) Maybe you can point me in some helpful directions. I certainly would welcome any comments from you on my lengthy series on dual aspect monism.