I cannot see how your argument differs from physicalism when you say "in this causal universe there are only causes and effects. No labels good and evil." Can you explain how this differs from reductionistic physicalism. You say moral relativism is BS but I can't see how you take a contrary position.

(As a personal aside, I always appreciate your thoughts and comments and have learned a lot from you, and you mostly disagree with me, which is fine. What is a bit harder to take is when you characterize my argument or position as BS.)