Thanks Bernhard, but Parfit’s answer appears to me to be a dodge. Of course one can assume eternal existence as a sort of just so story. That’s what Sean Carroll and Laurence Krauss do in order to evade the evidence for intention. It just looks to me like underlying this is a basic assumption fir which there is no effort to prove and belief that no proof is needed. There are two assumptions that trouble me: first is existence, and second is the “program” that just is.

--

Husband, father, grandfather, mostly-retired, farm advocate, author, communicator. Deeply curious about science, nature, spirit and history.

Love podcasts or audiobooks? Learn on the go with our new app.

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store
Gerald R. Baron

Gerald R. Baron

Husband, father, grandfather, mostly-retired, farm advocate, author, communicator. Deeply curious about science, nature, spirit and history.