Thanks George, a question: when you say evidence do you really mean proof? If so, I agree with you. If you mean evidence as facts that suggest a direction, or something like that, I would very much disagree. I’ll offer just one example although there are many: Fine tuning for life. The facts of the incredibly fine tuned and coordinated constants have convinced a great many that there is evidence for design and if design likely a creator. Antony Flew is just one of them. Over 90% of Nobel laureates believe in some form of God, spiritual being or higher power. Are they all ignoring the obvious? The book Cosmos, Bios, Theos has statements from dozens and dozens of some of the most well known and respected scientists of the past 100 years as to their view of God or a higher power and how they derive these ideas from nature. Can you defend the simple statement that the evidence is non-existent? Or is that statement only directed to an idea of God held by adherents of the Abrahamic religions?