Thanks Mitchell, I appreciate your perspective as a scientist and I hope you continue to follow and comment on this series. You are right that the ideas of Russell, James, etc., are ill defined and ambiguous. I am trying hard to put some meat on this skeleton mostly through the work of Atmanspacher but also found Paul Halpern's book Synchronicity somewhat helpful. I am also eager to dive into Polkinghorne's view of dual aspect monism in connecting information and energy, but trying to take this a step at a time. Working through the Paul-Jung collaboration in more detail, but also found some fascinating thoughts on this from John Archibald Wheeler.